Gender Politics and the Liminality of the Herculean Body Essay

Sophocles’s Women of Trachis11, however, deals solely with the tragic drama occurring on the mortal realm, devoid of any cosmic underpinnings. The play, like Heracles, can be divided into two portions. Unlike Heracles, however, Heracles’s world is divided not so much into the microcosmic and the macrocosmic, but into the masculine and feminine. This division is causal, serving to highlight the tension between the domestic world which values emotion, empathy, and feeling and the heroic world which champions duty, honour, and glory. Despite the evident causality, however, the play is marked by Heracles’s and Deianeira’s seemingly implausible deaths, highlighting the illogical aspect of male and female relations as a whole even outside the striking of the inexplicable cosmic event. In both plays, the Herculean body is the locus of a female tension in which the female struggle at being pushed aside is foregrounded. In Sophocles’s play, Heracles acts like Lycus, ravaging a foreign land in order to marry the king’s daughter. Heracles’s inability to be restored into society due his insatiable appetite for women causes endless issues for Deianeira, as she is left at home wasting with desire†¦ like the mournful nightingale† (107-8) in a â€Å"strange household† (41) for â€Å"fifteen months†¦ without tidings† (46). While the Euripidean hero â€Å"is honourable and, as the play resolves itself, more and more an identifiable man†, â€Å"the Sophoclean suffering hero is repellent as well as distant† (12 Silk)12. While Heracles acts out the hero’s pathos, thus, Women of Trachis views how the self-serving character of the Herculean hero can inflict suffering on the feminine realm by providing the audience with a point of sympathy from the female angle. Like Her... .... While Women of Trachis addresses the position of the feminine in a male-dominated warrior society on a microcosmic level, Heracles also highlights the feminine perspective, only on a macrocosmic level. Both plays, thus, foreground the pathos of the individual in the grips of forces beyond their control when conflicting realms meet and erupt. Heracles’s body, in being a liminal space where definitions of the cosmic and divine are blurred, is the site where the individual’s larger struggle is acted out. Unlike Heracles, however, Women of Trachis proposes the idea that humanism cannot save the day unless the very definitions of what is means to be heroic are changed so the young, helpless and the female are taken into account. In order for the king to be a proper king, he has to leave behind his heroic, divine self and â€Å"choose (Amphitryon) (as his) father† (1265).

Essay --

Why would a married man pursue a woman in hopes of gaining more than a platonic relationship? Dmitri Gurov is a Russian womanizer that spent two weeks on a vacation resort in Yalta. During his stay, Dmitri always took interest in the new women that arrived in Yalta. He discovered a young lady with a dog walking along the sea-front. Whenever he saw her approaching the public garden, he would always make a presence to meet her there. There are definitely characteristics of his personality that caused Dmitri to venture beyond his marriage. Dmitri was married at a young age. Dmitri was not happy in his marriage. His wife considered herself very intelligent. However, Dmitri considered her unintelligent, non- attractive, and did not like to be home with her. He had been unfaithful to her for a long time. Due to the lost love Dmitri had for his wife, his view for all women took a negative stand. Whenever women were discussed in his presence, he spoke about them in a negative manner. He referred to them as â€Å"the lower race† (252). Dmitri did not like to affiliate with members of the same sex. In the presence of men, he was he was bored and uncommunicative. Although he spoke negatively about women, he felt comfortable in their presence and knew what to say to them. The way he conducted himself in public, as well as his personal appearance grabbed the women attention and lured them to him. However, something about women got his attention and drew him to them. Dmitri meets the lady with the dog while dining in the gardens. While waiting at a table to be served, the lady with the red beret took the table next to him. Dmitri assumed the lady was married by the way she walked; the way she dressed, the way she did her hair, and her expression. ... ... All awhile Anna had been deceived by the man she fell in love with, not knowing Dmitri true feelings for women. However, the two of them shared a common bond. Regardless of how Dmitri felt about other women, his compassion for Anna was something he never experienced with any other woman. To conclude, While on vacation at a resort in Yalta; two people of the opposite sex both married and unhappy, meet and establish a relationship beyond their imagination. When they departed the resort, their relationship never ended. However, it continued to grow. The two would occasionally visit each other to rekindle the relationship previously established. Throughout this man’s life, his view of women took a negative stand. For he had deceived himself by thinking he could never have the feelings of love for a woman. The women that he fell deeply in love with had proven him wrong.

Icarus and the Myth of Deconstruction :: Essays Papers

Icarus and the Myth of Deconstruction In all three texts, it is the act of analysis which seems to occupy the center of the discursive stage, and the act of analysis of the act of analysis which in some way disrupts that centrality. In the resulting asymmetrical, abyssal structure, no analysis -- including this one -- can intervene without transforming and repeating other elements in the sequence, which is not a stable sequence. Barbara Johnson "The Frame of Reference" The Critical Difference 1. Introduction Among its detractors, literary theory has a reputation for sinful ignorance of both literature and the outside world; literary critics either overemphasize the word at the expense of context (as in formalistic criticisms) or overemphasize context at the expense of the word (as in political and historical criticisms). However, deconstruction holds a particularly tenuous position among literary theories as a school that apparently commits both sins; while formalistically focusing on the words on the page, deconstruction subjects those words to unnatural abuse. Thus, deconstruction seems locked in the ivory tower, in the company of resentful New-Critical neighbors. Such charges have received insufficient response from deconstruction's top theorists who, though they define and redefine the basic tenets of their approach, fail to justify such an approach in the world. They have explained their purpose, but not their motivation. With this desperate need in mind, then, embarking on any new piece of deconstruction poses a twofold demand: to not only seek to unfold new facets of a text (or texts) through a deconstructive lens, but to aim that lens outside of literature and show its implications in society, away from any ivory tower. Ovid, Pieter Brueghel and W. H. Auden have (inadvertently) created a lineage convenient to these demands. In Ovid's myth "Concerning the Fall of Icarus" from Metamorphoses[i], he created a character that has become an icon, several millennia later. Pieter Brueghel adopted the icon in the sixteenth century for his painting Landscape with the Fall of Icarus, which then received famous treatment in the twentieth century by W. H. Auden in his poem "Musà ©e Des Beaux Arts." These three works provide a beautiful, laboratory-quality arena in which to apply various deconstructive ideas: Jacques Derrida's theories of translation and the "dangerous supplement" and Roland Barthes' conception of the myth as language. However, such an inheritance necessarily extends to include the critical work that draws it together.

Concern of Government Trade Policy Essay

Whose interests should be the paramount concern of government trade policy – the interests of producers (the business and the employees) or of the consumers? This is a very interesting question. I would hope that the policies that are in place by the government would help not only the producers but in the long run would also help the consumers. The government has a responsibility to ensure that businesses will get that competitive advantage in the global business world. That said, if governments place were to place too much of its interest in businesses, the consumers would definitely suffer immensely. Historically, the United States has made many mistakes where we have protected the producers and companies and have developed many policies to ensure American companies do not fail. The book discusses the steel industry and how government placed an Ad Valorem Tariff on steel. It talked about how we wanted to protect domestic steel producers and how government had too many policies in place. That eventually was counterproductive and it raised the cost of production. This then caused the output to fail miserably and before we know it, we eliminated that tariff within two years. Can we learn from this mistake in the future? Sure we can. But you need the right people for the job. We need to make sure better policy-making decisions are made and that local content requirement is occurring. The book talks about government intervention. When it does, it seems to me, that it is talking about protecting the inefficient companies, people’s jobs, and industries from unfair foreign competition. While employees may well lose their jobs if there are more well-organized and competent foreign competitors, I would argue that this is the nature of competition, and that the role of government should be to help these employees get jobs where they can be efficiently employed rather than to protect them from reality. Government intervention can also lead to trade wars. Government intervention  usually ends up not working. The European Common Agriculture Policy by European farmers backfired and has cost consumers greatly. One the other side of the spectrum, if government does not set policies to protect the interests of businesses then global firms, companies, may come in and take an unfair advantage, a.k.a. the Steel industry in 2002.

Good and Evil and Generosity Essay

Generosity is seeing others more important than you. It is giving everything you have without expecting something in return. No matter they hurt you or abandon you, you still keep on loving them the same as before. You don’t get offended by what they do. You don’t look at their imperfections. Thus, generosity is related to unconditional love. The same as the father in the parable. For him, both sons are everything. In them he wants to pour out his very life. It is clear that the father symbolizes God. The God whose goodness, love, forgiveness, care, joy, and compassion have no limits. The God who welcomes us when we go back or gives us what we’ve asked. As the famous verse goes, â€Å"ask and you will receive; seek and you will find’ knock and the door will be open. † God is so good. He loves us so much that he gave us His only son; but it breaks our hearts that many are abusing His love. God created us in his own image and likeness. Thus, we need to become like Him. We must be as generous as the father is generous. Just as the father pour out his life to his children, so we must give ourselves to our brother and sisters. This giving of self is a discipline because it is something that does not come spontaneously. As the saying goes, â€Å"if you love, be ready to be hurt. † Using the perspective of a generous person, we say that it is wrong. Loving is giving; giving everything. If you truly love a person, you should not be affected by little things. You shouldn’t be jealous. It’s the nature of love. Every time we take a step in the direction of generosity, we are moving from fear to love. But these steps are hard. Why love if you’ll be hurt? Why waste your time and effort to someone who doesn’t care or doesn’t appreciate you? Why should we share our life with someone who has shown no respect for it? To sum up everything, generosity creates the family it believes in. Generosity is freely sharing what you have with others. It is being willing to offer money, help or time when it is needed. To be generous means giving something that is valuable to you without expectation of reward or return. Many traditions measure generosity not by the size of the gift, but by what it cost the giver. Sometimes generosity requires pushing past a feeling of reluctance because we all instinctively want to keep good things for ourselves. Even so, we can structure our lives in ways that make generosity more spontaneous and fun. When we intentionally â€Å"live below our means† and avoid over commitment, we cultivate a sense of bounty or surplus that makes us want to share. When we give, we reap the pleasure of knowing we have made someone else’s life a little happier. Generosity brings balance in the life of the individuals as a result of which they are bound to achieve unimaginable success in their lives. We should understand the fact that though it is a bit difficult to be generous in all the situations in life but at the end generosity bears the fruits of peace, success and happiness in the lives of individuals.

The Jamestown Fiasco Commentary

According to Edmund S. Morgan, the majority of problems faced by the first settlers who arrived to Jamestown in the year 1607 were caused by the poor organization within the colony. For example, the settlers were unwilling to grow their own food supply and establish a reliable foundation for future settlers. Despite the abundance of game to hunt, and perfect weather conditions to harvest crops, the settlers would instead dig up corpses, and in one case a man killed his wife and ate her in order to survive the starvation. By the year 1610, only 60 settlers had survived. Morgan’s portrayed the settlers as lazy, who were starving by mere choice. Another problem faced by the first settlers of Jamestown was, according to John Smith, one of the colony leaders, that there were too many men in the grain fields, yet very few of them were working to crop the field. Morgan also points out that since the settlers felt superior to the Indians, they believed it was not their job to harvest the crops for the colonies. Instead, they would spend their time raiding Indian territory, and burning down crops that could have been used to feed the starving settlers back in the colony. Their own governor once sent one of the settlers, George Percy, to destroy the town of the Paspaheghs where he believed Powhaten kept his runaway English man. It is obvious then, and as stated by Morgan, that the reason Jamestown failed to develop as it was expected was caused mainly by the unwillingness of the settlers to work, and to create an organized and stable order for their community.

Kmf Project

Karnataka State law University. Navanagar, HUBLI – 580 025. ————————————————- Phone: 0836-2222392 Fax: 0836-2223392 ————————————————- Website: www. kslu. ac. in Principles and practices of management PROJECT:- done at KMF ( co-operative society) NAME:- Santosh B. M. CLASS:- B. B. A. ,LL. B(HONS)(1STSEM) R. NO:- 08 DATE:- 20-10-2012 SUBMITED TO:-Mr. Gangadhar G. TABLE OF CONTENTS * INDUSTRIAL PROFILE a) Introduction to co-operative society, ) Background, c) Evolution or development. *COMPANY PROFILEa) Background of company,b) Vision and mission statement society,c) Evolution of KMF,d) Products profile,e) Area of operation,f) Ownership pattern,g) Competitor information,h) Infrastructural facilities,i) Achievement or award if any,j) Future prospectus. *MC KENS Y’S 7s FRAME WORKa) Structure,b) Skill,c) Style,d) Strategy,e) System,f) Staff,g) Share value. *SWOT analysis. * Summary of latest annual report. (a)INTRODUCTION TO CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETYThere is no universally accepted definition of a co-operative. In general, a co-operative is a business owned and democratically controlled by the people who use its services and whose benefits are derived and distributed equitably on the basis of use. The user-owners are called members. They benefit in two ways from the co-operative, in proportion to the use they make of it. First, the more they use the co-operative, the more service they receive. Second, earnings are allocated to members based on the amount of business they do with the co-operative. In many ways, co-operatives resemble other businesses. They have similar physical facilities, perform similar functions and must follow sound business practices. They are usually incorporated- under state law by filing articles of incorporation, granting them the right to do business. The organizers draw up bylaws and other necessary legal papers. Members elect a board of directors. The board sets policy and hires a manager to run the day-to-day operations. But in some ways, co-operatives are distinctly different from other businesses. These differences are found in the co-operative's purpose, its ownership and control, and how benefits are distributed. They are reflected in co-operative principles that explain the unique aspects of doing business on a co-operative basis. CO-OPERATIVE  SOCIETY A  co-operative  society  is  formed  by  the  people  of  limited  means  for  self  help through  mutual help. It is  set  up to  protect  economically  the  poor  sections  of  the  society. It is  set  up  for cooperation,  not  for  competition. The  motto  of a  society  is  self  help,  without  dependence  on other  business  units.DEFINITIONAccording  to  Herrik,†Cooperation  is an  action  of  persons  voluntarily  united  for  utilizing  reciprocally  their  own forces,  resources  or  both  under  mutual  management  for  their  common  profit  or  loss. † According  t o Mr. Plunket, â€Å"The  cooperation  is  self  help  made  effective  by  organization. † Co-operative  SocietyADVANTAGES  OF  CO-OPERATIVE  SOCIETYFollowing  are  the  important  advantages  or  merits  of  co-operative  society:1. Advantage  for  Farmers2. Easy  Formation3. Equal  Rights .4. Equal  Distribution  of  Wealth5. Economic  Democracy .6. Elimination  of  Middlemen7. Financial  Assistance8. Friendly  Relations9. Improve  the  Standard  of  Living.10. Increase  in  EmploymentDISADVANTAGES  OF  CO-OPERATIVE  SOCIETYFollowing  are  the  disadvantages  of  co-operative  societies:1. Lack  of  Capital2. Untrained  Supervision3. Defective  Organization4. Illiterate  and  Ignorant.5. Lack  of  Experience6. Lack  of  Discipline7. Lack  of  Sincere  Management8. Lack  of  Profit  Incentive9. Lack  of  Secrecy10. Lack  of  Knowledge (b)BA CKGROUND AND EVOLUTION OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETYIn one sense, cooperation is probably as old as civilization. Early people had to learn to work together to meet their common needs, or perish. The Pilgrims who settled at Plymouth, jointly cleared fields abandoned by the Indians, broke up the soil, and planted and cared for their corn. After the harvest, celebrated with the Indians in 1621 with a Thanks giving fest, the corn was shared equally among the settlers. Legend suggests that the initial structured co-operative business in the United States was the Philadelphia Contribution-ship for the Insurance of Houses from Loss by Fire, a mutual fire insurance company established in 1752. This association's reputation is likely based on two factors. First, Benjamin Franklin was the organizer. Second, the business has been conducted so efficiently over the years that it is still operating today. In the early 1800s, co-operative businesses appeared on several fronts. In Britain, co-operatives were formed as a tool to deal with the depressed economic and social conditions related to the struggles with Napoleon and industrialization. In the United States, farmers began to process their milk into cheese on a co-operative basis in diverse places such as Goshen, CT, and Lake Mills, WI. Writers sometimes trace the origin of co-operatives from the Rochdale Equitable Pioneers' Society, an urban, consumer co-operative organized in England in 1844. It sold consumer goods such as food and clothing to persons unhappy with the merchants in the community    While neither the first nor most successful early co-operative, the Rochdale Society developed an active outreach program, encouraging and assisting others to form co-operatives. It also prepared a written list of practices and policies that seemed consistent with success of such efforts. This list became one of the first sets of co-operative principles, characteristics that distinguish co-operatives from non co-operative businesses. The Grange, founded in 1867, quickly became the major thrust behind agricultural and rural co-operatives in America. In 1874, a Grange representative went to Europe to gather information about co-operatives. In 1875, the Grange published a set of rules for the organization of co-operative stores, based on the Rochdale principles. Local granges organized stores to serve their rural members. They sold groceries and clothing as well as general farm supplies, hardware and agricultural implements. Granges in the South marketed cotton. Those in Iowa operated grain elevators. In Kentucky, they sponsored warehouses for receiving and handling tobacco. California Granges exported wheat and marketed wool. As the country recovered from the depression of the 1870s, fewer Granges were organized and many co-operatives went out of business, but the impact of the Grange co-operative movement survives. It demonstrated that the Rochdale type of co-operative, which handled goods at prevailing prices and distributed net savings according to use, offered a sound basis for co-operative efforts in America. Cooperation flourished during the three decades from 1890 to 1920. As many as 14,000 farmer co-operatives were operating by the end of the period. Co-operative growth was fueled by the wave of other farmer movements and farm organizations sweeping the country, such as the American Society of Equity, National Farmers Union, and the American Farm Bureau Federation. They were engaged in marketing virtually every farm crop and furnishing supplies and services to their producer-members. Many of today's major farmer co-operatives were formed during this period. The following decades have seen farmer co-operatives develop their own financial institutions through the Farm Credit System. Non agricultural co-operatives likewise developed the National Co-operative Bank. With help from the Rural Electrification Administration, rural residents used co-operatives to bring electric and telephone services to their towns and farms. The rural electrics formed the National Rural Electric Co-operative Finance Corporation (CFC) as a supplemental source of financing. Some co-operatives have become larger, partially in response to growing concentration among their competitors and the firms their members must deal with. They have adopted modern management techniques and sophisticated processing, distribution and marketing methods. Today rural and urban residents use co-operatives to acquire consumer services such as housing, credit and other financial services (through credit unions), groceries, education and telecommunications. Franchisees, governmental nits, hardware and grocery stores, florists and numerous other businesses use co-operatives to market their products and secure the supplies they need at competitive prices. (a) BACKGROUND Of KMF Every one in karnataka as well as india knows a bit about ‘  Karnataka Co-operative Milk Producers' Federation Limited' (KMF) is the Single Body in Karnataka represen ting Dairy Farmers' Co-operatives. It is the second largest dairy co-operative amongst the dairy co-operatives in the country. In South India it stands first in terms of procurement as well as sales. One of the core functions of the Federation is marketing of Milk and Milk Products. The Brand  Ã‚  Ã¢â‚¬ËœNANDINI’  is the household name for Pure and Fresh milk and milk products. KMF has 13 Milk Unions throughout the State which procure milk from Primary Dairy Co-operative Societies(DCS) and distribute milk to the consumers in various Towns/Cities/Rural markets in Karnataka. The first ever World Bank funded Dairy Development Program in the country started in Karnataka with the organisation of Village Level Dairy Co-operatives in 1974. The AMUL pattern of dairy co-operatives started functioning in Karnataka from 1974-75 with the financial assistance from World Bank, Operation Flood II ; III. The dairy co-operatives were established under the ANAND pattern in a three tier structure with the Village Level Dairy Co-operatives forming the base level, the District Level Milk Unions at the middle level to take care of the procurement, processing and marketing of milk and the Karnataka Milk Federation as the Apex Body to co-ordinate the growth of the sector at the State level. Coordination of activities among the Unions and developing market for Milk and Milk products is the responsibility of KMF. Marketing Milk in the respective jurisdiction is organized by the respective Milk Unions. Surplus/deficit of liquid milk among the member Milk Unions is monitored by the Federation. While the marketing of all the Milk Products is organized by KMF, both within and outside the State, all the Milk and Milk products are sold under a common brand name NANDINI. (b) MISSION AND VISION OF COMPANY Vision * To march forward with a missionary zeal which will make KMF a trailblazer of exemplary performance and  achievements beckoning other Milk Federations in the country in pursuit of total emulation of its good deeds. To ensure prosperity of the rural Milk producers who are ultimate owners of the Federation. * To promote producer oriented viable co-operative society to impart an impetus to the rural income, dairy productivity and rural employment. * To abridge the gap between price of milk procurement and sale price. * To develop business acumen in marketing and trading disciplines so as to serve consumers with quality milk, give a fillip to the income of milk producers. To compet e with MNCs and Private Dairies with better quality of milk and milk products and in the process sustain invincibility of co-operatives. MISSION * Heralding economic, social and cultural prosperity in the lives of our milk producer  members by promoting vibrant, self-sustaining and holistic co-operative dairy development in Karnataka State (c) Evolution Karnataka Milk Federation which is most popular as KMF, evolved itself as a premier and most profitable dairy farmers' organization in the State of Karnataka. As an agency in 1975 to implement the World Bank Aided Dairy Development Projects, Karnataka Dairy Development Corporation (KDDC) was formed, the company grew itself fast and as it spreads the wings of new found rural economic activity – Dairying all over the State, the genesis of apex co-operative body took the shape of KMF in 1983 encompassing entire State with 13 District Co-operative Milk Unions executing the various parameters of Dairy activity – organization of Dairy Co-operatives, Milk Routes, Veterinary Services, Procurement of milk in two shifts of the day, Chilling, Processing of milk, distribution of milk and also establishment of Cattle Feed Plants, Nandini Sperm Station, Liquid Nitrogen Supply, Training Centres – as its main stay. The entire system was reconstructed on the model of now well known `ANAND' pattern dairy co-operative societies. Eight southern districts of Karnataka was considered initially with a target of organizing 1800 Dairy Co-opera tive Societies, four Milk Unions and processing facilities were set up to the tune of 6. 5 lakhs per day by 1984. Under Operation Flood – II ;III, project which started in 1984 ; 1987 covered the remaining parts of Karnataka. Thirteen milk unions are organized in 175 talukas of all 20 districts then and the field work was extended by organizing more dairy co-operative societies. The processing facilities i. e. hilling centers, milk dairies and powder plants were transferred in phases to the administrative control of respective co-operative milk unions and the activities continued to be implemented by these District Organisations. Additional processing facilities were created ; existing facilities augmented every decade with the help of Govt. / Zilla Panchayat and NDDB to handle ever increasing milk procurement without declaring milk holidays. The processing facility as exists at 32. 25 lakh liters/day is further strengthened. (d) AREA OF OPERATION IN KARNATAKA KARNATAKA MAP I n this Karnataka map we can see the area of operation of K. M. F the symbol is K. M. Fs area of operation in Karnataka. K. M. F is having branches in almost all districts of KARNATAKA UNITS OF KMF KMF has the following Units functioning directly under its control: * Mother Dairy, Yelahanka,Bangalore. * Nandini Hi-Tech Product Plant, Channarayapatna. * Nandini Milk Products, KMF Complex, Bangalore. * Cattle Feed Plants at Rajanukunte/Gubbi/Dharwad/Hassan. * Nandini Sperm Station (formerly known as Bull Breeding Farm ; Frozen Semen Bank) at Hessaraghatta. * Pouch Film Plant at Munnekolalu, Marathhalli. * Central Training Institute,Bangalore ; Traning Institutes at Mysore/Dharwad. * Sales Depots at B'lore,Mysore,M'lore,Hubli,Gulbarga,Tirupathi ; Kannur (e) OWNERSHIP PATTERN Ownership K. M. F is like this a) District co-operative societies (b) National dairy development board (f) PRODUCTS PROFILE Nandini homogenized milk in pure milk which is homgenized And pasteurization consistent right through it gives you more cup of tea and coffee and its easily digestable. Nandini ghee made purely from cows milk and not a dultrated. and good for health Cows pure milk, UHT processed bacteria free in tamper proof tera fino pack . which keep milk fresh upto 60 days without refrigeration until opened , available in 500 ml and also in 1 liter Toned milk from nandini fresh and pure milk containing 3. 0 % fat and 8. 5% snf . available in 500 ml 1 liter . Full ice cream milk from nandini containing 6% fat and 9% SNF a rich creamy and tastier milk for home made sweets. (e) COMPETATORS INFORMATION 1. Arokya milk dairy- it procures most of its milk from milk unions of belgum . it procures 10,000 liter’s of milk every day. It’s located near desur ,near belgum 10 km away from city on NH-4. 2. Mayor dairy – it procures milk from belgum and other regional dirsticts mainly chikkodi, rayabhag ,and athani. Procures more than 25,000 liters daily. its located near kholapur,and supplys milk to all over state. 3. Adity milk dairy – a well known company in north Karnataka and procures milk 25,000 milk (approx) 4. Ram-Rahim milk dairy – this is solely owned small scale rivate company established in1987 with an investment of 2. 28 lack in dharwad (f) FUTURE PROSPECTUS PERSPECTIVE PLAN- 2010 – After the closure of OF-III project. Government of Karnataka and NDDB signed an MOU during February 2000, for further s trengthening the Dairy Development Activities in Karnataka with an outlay of Rs. 250 Crores. Consequent to the announcement of new lending terms and conditions by NDDB through an evolution of an action plan – Perspective 2010 to enable the dairy co-operatives to face the challenges of the increased demand for milk and milk products by focusing efforts in the four major thrust areas of Strengthening the Co-operatives. Enhancing Productivity, Managing Quality and building a National Information Network, plans are under implementation. FUTURE  VISION To consolidate the gains of Dairying achieved in the state of Karnataka and with a view  to efficiently chill, process and market ever developing and increasing milk procurement with an utmost emphasis on the Quality and in the process conserve the socio-economic interests of rural milk producers, the Govt. of Karnataka through KMF has proposed to undertake several projects with financial and technical support of NDDB for which an MOU was signed between Govt. of Karnataka and NDDB on 10th Nov. 2004. (g) THE GROWTH PROCESS The growth over the years and activities undertaken by KMF is summarised briefly hereunder: ITEMS| UNITS| 1976-77| 2011-2012(Up to Mar'12)| 2012-13(Upto Aug'12| Dairy Co-operatives| Nos| 416| 13006 REGED / 11568 Funct|   Ã‚     13242 REGED /11773Funct  Ã‚                          Ã‚  | Membership| Nos| 37000| 21. 51 Lacs|   Ã‚                       21. 84 Lacs| Avg. Milk Procurement| Kgs/day| 50000| Avg. 42. 85  Ã‚  Ã‚  Peak  Proc. 46. 49(Nov'11) LKPD| Avg. 49. 45Peak  Proc. 52. 76(June'12LKPD| Milk Sales| Lts/day| 95050| 28. 90 LLPD / Curd:2. 74 LKPD / Good life   2. 19 LLPD| 28. 18 LLPD / Curd:3. 11 LKPD / Good life   2. 19    LLPD| Cattle Feed Consumed| Kgs/DCS| 220| 2958| 3025| Daily Payment to Farmers| Rs. Lakhs| 0. 90| 785|   Ã‚                             987| Turnover| Rs. Crores| | 5823. 69|   Ã‚                     ———-| World Bank Study – Observations The World Bank, in its study on the effect of Co-operative dairying in Karnataka, has pointed out that : * The villages with Dairy Co-operative Societies are much better off than those without. * The families with dairy cattle are economically better than those without dairy cattle. * Women who had no control on the household income have better control in terms of Milk Money. * A single commodity ? MILK? has acted as a catalyst in the change in the Socio-Economic impact of the rural economy. * There is a positive impact on those at the lower end of the economic ladder both in terms of landholding and caste PART B MC KENSY’S 7S FRAME WORK MC Kensys’s 7s frame work – the 7s is popularly known as mc kensy’s 7s ,because two persons developed this model Tom peter and Robert waterman . they both have been consultants at MC Kensy’s co. At that time they published 7s in their article ‘STRUCTURE IS NOT ORGANISATION’ , in 1980 . ‘ART OF JAPANESE MANAGEMENT’ in 1981,and in ‘IN SEARCH OF EXCELLENCE’ in 1982. Model consists of 7 elements they are distinguished as ‘hard and soft skills’. Hard skills are feasible and easy to understand, soft skills are known by workers department. I. (a) STRUCTURE OF ORGANISATION UNDER BOARD OF MANAGEMENT II. (b) STRATAGY * To achieve national goal K. M. F works a lot to change according to consumer needs and taste. Maintaining consistant growth adn expansion of market all over india. * Tries to stick to stick to plan and achieves objectives. * Maintaining quality of product and acquiring market. III. (c) SYSTEM K . M. F works in a systematic manner in production and in management ,while producing they follow to ways * Maintaining enough inventory. * Well equipped storage facility. * Fast transportation. IV. (e) STAFF – This co-operative society makes use of various principle of staffing and recruitment Other like personel, promotion, induction, salaries, and other benifits to make thir woekers perform well and to extract maximum from their work. V. (f) SKILL Here staff is recruited according to skill , like differentiating between educational skill and hard skills . and they also train their workers for skill development. VI. (g) STYLE K. M. F a specific style of work like it (a) strictly follows rules and regulation (b) co-ordination between workers (c) reliable and dependable VII. (h) SHARED VALUES Some fundamental and core values which are spread and shared in the organisation in KMF they are * Consumer satisfaction, * Commitment to quality, * Cost and time conciseness, * Innovative and creativity, * Trust and team spirit , * Individual respect, * Integrity. PART C S. W. O. T ANALYSIS STRENGHTS * enjoys good market, * Wide distribution, * It has good will, * Enjoys market region * Less transport cost to local areas, * WEAKNESS * Less sales and consumer handling, * Commissions paid is less compared to other brands, * In adequate sales promotional activities, * OPPORTUNITIES * There is scope in new developing areas * Availability of mil k , * Wide area to extract source, * THREATES * Lots of emerging pioneer companies, * Low level of consumer awareness, * Tough competition. ANNUAL REPORT As we can see that annual report of company is quite impressive , and company is performing well. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. KMF DHARWAD.